Non-conscious vs. Deliberate dynamic decision-making—A pilot experiment

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects of non-conscious vs. deliberate ways of making decisions in a dynamic decision-making task. An experimental setting is used to study this question; three experimental groups are distinguished: immediate decision-making (only very limited time for deliberate cognitive processing), considerate decision-making (relatively long time for deliberate cognitive processing), and distracted decision-making (time for non-conscious cognitive processing only). As experimental stimulus, a simulator based on the Kaibab Plateau model was employed. With a sample size of more than 100 experimental participants, group differences are not significant for most data examined. Implications comprise the formulation of a framework to guide further research. The value of this paper lies in the fact that it connects to a recent discussion in psychology and transfers it to a domain in the core interest of the system community: decision-making in situations with dynamic complexity. Furthermore, it offers a range of improvement points for potential follow-up studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Größler, A., Rouwette, E., & Vennix, J. (2016). Non-conscious vs. Deliberate dynamic decision-making—A pilot experiment. Systems, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4010013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free