Management of Squamous Atypia (Borderline Nuclear Abnormalities): Repeat Cytology or Colposcopy?

11Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Summary: A prospective cytological, colposcopic and histological study was conducted in 44 women with cervical cytology showing borderline nuclear abnormalities insufficient for the diagnosis of dyskaryosis. Atypical squamous epithelium was found on colposcopy in 41 patients and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was diagnosed on histology in 33 patients (75%) including 10 with CIN 3. Repeat cytology obtained under colposcopic vision was negative in 12 (33.4%) patients with CIN. The high prevalence of CIN in smears showing only borderline nuclear abnormalities and the high false negative rate of repeat cytology indicate that colposcopy should be the first line of management for these patients. Copyright © 1987, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

COG, S. K. T., CPath, D. J., & Singer, A. (1987). Management of Squamous Atypia (Borderline Nuclear Abnormalities): Repeat Cytology or Colposcopy? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.1987.tb00965.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free