Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids

22Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To prevent pyrogenic reactions and bacteremia in hemodialysis patients, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation and the Centers for Disease Control recommend culturing of hemodialysis fluids (water and dialysate) at least once a month. The recommendations for total microbial counts are (i) ≤200 CFU/ml in water used to prepare dialysate or reprocess hemodialyzers and (ii) ≤2,000 CFU/ml for the dialysate. In accordance with the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation recommendations all cultures should be incubated at 37°C for 48 h on suitable culture media, such as Trypticase soy agar, standard methods agar, or one of several commercially available assay systems. There have been suggestions that lower temperatures and longer incubation might improve the recovery of bacteria from water and dialysate. In this study bacterial recovery from various dialysis fluids (water, bicarbonate dialysate, and bicarbonate concentrate) at 30 and 37°C was compared. Duplicate sets of samples were membrane filtered (pore size, 0.45 μm); one set was incubated at 30°C and the other was incubated at 37°C for 72 h. The number of visible colonies was counted every 24 h by using a dissecting microscope. No significant difference was observed in specimens incubated at 37°C for 48 h compared with those incubated at 30°C for 72 h. Also, bacterial recovery was significantly better when samples of bicarbonate dialysate or bicarbonate concentrate were plated on Trypticase soy agar as opposed to standard methods agar.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Arduino, M. J., Bland, L. A., Aguero, S. M., & Favero, M. S. (1991). Effects of incubation time and temperature on microbiologic sampling procedures for hemodialysis fluids. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 29(7), 1462–1465. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.29.7.1462-1465.1991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free