Ethical reasoning in mathematics: New directions for didactics in u.s. mathematics education

6Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article we analyze the current state of the didactics of mathematics in the U.S. as it relates to research on equity. The sociopolitical turn in U.S. mathematics education resulted in a push for critical mathematics pedagogies (CMPs) in which predominantly marginalized populations of students explore social injustices through mathematics. We argue that mathematics education for equity must access broader populations of students and develop students’ ethical reasoning skills to build an ethical and equitable future. To address didactical limitations in U.S. mathematics education, we introduce the Ethical Reasoning in Mathematics Framework (ERiM) as a tool to analyze high school students’ ethical reasoning in real-world mathematics tasks. Using data from the initial phase of a Design Research project with students of privilege, we show how the ERiM Framework can be used to design lessons that elicit students’ critical math consciousness (CMC). We end the article with design implications and recommendations for future research on the didactics of equitable mathematics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Register, J., Stephan, M., & Pugalee, D. (2021). Ethical reasoning in mathematics: New directions for didactics in u.s. mathematics education. Mathematics, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080799

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free