Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in an Unselected Population

Abstract

Importance—In clinical trials, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to improve symptoms and quality of life. As this technology moves into general clinical practice, it is critical to evaluate the health status outcomes among unselected patients treated with TAVR. Design/Participants—Observational study of patients with severe aortic stenosis treated with TAVR in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry. Main Outcomes—Disease-specific health status was assessed at baseline and at 30 days (n=31,636) and 1 year after TAVR (n=7,014) with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-overall summary score (KCCQ-OS; range 0–100 points). We examined factors associated with health status at 1 year after TAVR using multivariable linear regression, with adjustment for baseline health status and accounting for clustering of patients within sites. Results—Mean baseline KCCQ-OS was 42.3±23.7, indicating substantial health status impairment. Surviving patients had, on average, large improvements in health status at 30 days that persisted to 1 year, with a mean improvement in the KCCQ-OS of 27.6 points at 30 days and 31.9 points at 1 year. Worse baseline health status, older age, higher ejection fraction, lung disease, home oxygen, lower mean aortic valve gradient, prior stroke, diabetes, pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, slower gait speed, and non-femoral access were associated with worse health status at 1 year. Overall, 62.3% of patients had a favorable outcome at 1 year (alive with reasonable quality of life [KCCQ-OS ≥60] and no significant decline [≥10 points] from baseline) with the lowest rates seen among patients with severe lung disease (51.4%), on dialysis (47.7%), or with very poor baseline health status (49.2%). Conclusion—In a national, contemporary clinical practice cohort of unselected patients, we found that improvement in health status following TAVR was similar to that seen in the pivotal clinical trials. While the health status results were favorable for the majority of patients, ~1 in 3 patients still had a poor outcome 1 year after TAVR. Continued efforts are needed to improve patient selection and procedural/post-procedural care in order to maximize health status outcomes of this evolving therapy.