PSMA-targeted radiotracers versus 18F fluciclovine for the detection of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

58Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: National guidelines endorse fluorine 18 (18F) fluciclovine PET/CT for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in men with biochemically recurrent PCa. The comparative performance between fluciclovine and gallium 68 or 18F prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT, a newer examination, is unclear. Purpose: To compare the detection of biochemical recurrence using fluciclovine versus PSMA-targeted radiotracers in patients with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level less than 2 ng/mL. Materials and Methods: With use of the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy, or PRISMA-DTA, guidelines, a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases between 2012 and 2019 was performed. Studies of fluciclovine PET/CT or PSMA PET/CT in biochemical recurrence were identified. PSA levels, clinical data, and reference standards were obtained when available. A random-effects model was applied to pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) around the prevalence of a positive examination, stratified according to PSA tier. Results: Quantitative analysis included 482 patients (median age, 67 years; interquartile range, 67–67 years) in six fluciclovine studies and 3217 patients (median age, 68 years; interquartile range, 67–70 years) in 38 PSMA studies. Pooled detection rates for PSMA and fluciclovine were 45% (95% CI: 38%, 52%) and 37% (95% CI: 25%, 49%), respectively, for a PSA level less than 0.5 ng/mL (P = .46); 59% (95% CI: 52%, 66%) and 48% (95% CI: 34%, 61%) for a PSA level of 0.5–0.9 ng/mL (P = .19); and 80% (95% CI: 75%, 85%) and 62% (95% CI: 54%, 70%) for a PSA level of 1.0–1.9 ng/mL (P = .01). A reference standard was positive in 703 of 735 patients (96%) in the PSMA cohort and 247of 256 (97%) in the fluciclovine cohort. Conclusion: Patient-level detection rates for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer were greater for prostate-specific membrane antigen–targeted radiotracers than fluciclovine for prostate specific antigen levels of 1.0–1.9 ng/mL.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tan, N., Oyoyo, U., Bavadian, N., Ferguson, N., Mukkamala, A., Calais, J., & Davenport, M. S. (2020). PSMA-targeted radiotracers versus 18F fluciclovine for the detection of prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after definitive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology, 296(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020191689

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free