Reliability of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Muscle Perfusion in Health and Peripheral Arterial Disease

36Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We investigated the reliability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in assessing calf muscle microvascular perfusion in health and disease. Response to a post-occlusive reactive hyperaemia test was repeated on two occasions >48h apart in healthy young (28±7y) and elderly controls (70±5y), and in peripheral arterial disease patients (PAD, 69±7y; n=10, 9 and 8 respectively). Overall, within-individual reliability was poor (coefficient of variation [CV] range: 15-87%); the most reliable parameter was time to peak (TTP, 15-48% CV). Nevertheless, TTP was twice as long in elderly controls and PAD compared to young (19.3±10.4 and 22.0±8.6 vs. 8.9±6.2s respectively; p<0.01), and area under the curve for contrast intensity post-occlusion (a reflection of blood volume) was ~50% lower in elderly controls (.p<0.01 versus PAD and young). Thus, CEUS assessment of muscle perfusion during reactive hyperaemia demonstrated poor reliability, yet still distinguished differences between PAD patients, elderly and young controls.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thomas, K. N., Cotter, J. D., Lucas, S. J. E., Hill, B. G., & van Rij, A. M. (2015). Reliability of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the Assessment of Muscle Perfusion in Health and Peripheral Arterial Disease. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 41(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.06.012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free