The Mirror Account of Hope and Fear

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I provide a unified account of hope and fear as propositional attitudes. This “mirror account” is based on the historical idea that the only difference between hope and fear is the conative attitude involved, positive for hope and negative for fear. My analysis builds on a qualified version of the standard account of hope. The epistemic condition is formulated in terms of live possibility and the conative according to a non-reductive view on desire and aversion. The account demonstrates the theoretical fruitfulness of accepting Jack M. C. Kwong’s distinction between hope and fear as propositional attitudes and experiential states.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Palmqvist, C. J. (2023). The Mirror Account of Hope and Fear. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 53(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2024.2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free