Is It Time to Abandon Hospital Accreditation?

8Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Hospitals contracting with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) must comply with Conditions of Participation (CoP), enforced by 4 certified independent accrediting organizations (AOs) or individual state survey. Recent work documents that the system fails to achieve consistent clinical outcomes, allowing several-fold variation in mortality and patient safety. Other publicly reported evidence shows weaker clinical performance by state-surveyed hospitals, inexplicable variation in individual state surveys, and recurring disagreement between initial and audit surveyors. Although the leading AOs and CMS are committed to continuous improvement, a proven management system that is extensively documented in hospitals, accreditation has not achieved it. Requiring an auditable public annual report by each hospital, including improvement targets and analogous to the 10K reports required of publicly listed corporations, might create a more effective system. Updating the CoP and refocusing the on-site inspection also would help.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Griffith, J. R. (2018). Is It Time to Abandon Hospital Accreditation? American Journal of Medical Quality, 33(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1062860617707578

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free