Abstract
Context: Glycemic disturbance is usually less severe in pregnant women with type 2 than in those with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM). Nevertheless, a worse perinatal outcome in women with type 2 DM has been reported in some studies. Objective: Our objective was to review maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnant women with type 2 vs. type 1 DM. Study Selection: We conducted a systematic review of papers providing original data on pregnancy outcomes in both type 2 and type 1DM (Medline search of the period January 1, 1987, to June 30, 2008). Two independent investigators considered papers for eligibility, and a third one solved discrepancies. Data Extraction: Metaanalysis tools were used to compare four main outcomes (major congenital malformations, stillbirth, and neonatal and perinatal mortality) and 15 secondary ones (five maternal, 10 fetal). Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were used to assess quality. Data Synthesis: Thirty-three studies qualified for inclusion of 3743 citations retrieved. Women with type 2 DM had lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at booking and throughout pregnancy but a higher risk of perinatal mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.96] without significant differences in the rates of major congenital malformations, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality. As to secondary outcomes, women with type 2 DM had less diabetic ketoacidosis (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.34) and cesarean section (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59-0.94) without differences in other outcomes. Conclusions: Despite a milder glycemic disturbance,women with type 2 DM had no better perinatal outcomes than those with type 1, indicating that type 2 DM in pregnancy is a serious condition. Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Balsells, M., García-Patterson, A., Gich, I., & Corcoy, R. (2009). Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type 2 versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 94(11), 4284–4291. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1231
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.