Prediction of acute renal failure after cardiac surgery: Retrospective cross-validation of a clinical algorithm

62Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Acute renal failure (ARF) after cardiac surgery is associated with high costs and a poor prognosis. Based on the results of a large US study, an algorithm has been developed for predicting ARF from pre-operative risk factors. The aim of this study was to cross-validate this algorithm in a patient population from Europe, and to assess its usefulness as a clinical tool. Methods. All coronary bypass and valvular surgery patients from a 5-year period were included. Data on pre-operative risk factors for all patients who developed dialysis-dependent ARF and for a random sample of patients without ARF were retrospectively obtained from hospital databases and medical records. For each patient, a risk score for ARF was calculated on the basis of the algorithm. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the score's ability to predict ARF were estimated. Results. 2037 patients were included. The risk of ARF was 1.9%, and the area under the ROC curve 0.71. For a risk score of 6 or higher, the sensitivity was 0.53, the specificity 0.71, the positive predictive value 0.03 and the negative predictive value 0.99. Conclusions. The validity of the algorithm was confirmed in a population differing in several aspects from the US populations where it was developed. Although it is useful for estimating the risk of ARF in groups of patients, the low risk of ARF limits the algorithm's ability to predict the outcome for individual patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksen, B. O., Hoff, K. R. S., & Solberg, S. (2003). Prediction of acute renal failure after cardiac surgery: Retrospective cross-validation of a clinical algorithm. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 18(1), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/18.1.77

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free