PERCEPTIONS OF WASTE PICKERS IN AN ASSOCIATION LOCATED IN SERIDÓ/RN ABOUT THE ADVERSE WORKING CONDITIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE COLLECTIVE SUBJECT

  • Dantas G
  • Forbeloni J
  • Pacheco A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the perceptions members of a waste picker association have regarding their recycling work in the Serido region of Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. The study followed two lines of investigation: one uses quantitative data collected from waste picker responses to survey questions and an extensive, intensive direct observation technique; the other uses qualitative data derived from researcher observations and discourses with the subjects. Direct observation was employed to better understand the association's operational process and the waste pickers' work related routine. Interviewees stated that their main reason to work as waste pickers in the association is that they want to be employed. Regarding their job satisfaction, they said that their fulfillment is linked with their monthly income. The major problems reported were low income, unhealthy working conditions, and society's preconceptions. In respect to their future plans, the majority affirmed that they will continue working with the association but conditioned this response on increased earnings. Finally, although laws have been developed that codify their profession and the income shared by the association has improved their status and security, there is still a long road to travel before mechanisms are in place to guarantee them decent jobs, socioeconomic inclusion and an improved quality of life.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dantas, G. C. B., Forbeloni, J. V., Pacheco, A. S. V., Campelo, I. C., & Farias, H. M. (2017). PERCEPTIONS OF WASTE PICKERS IN AN ASSOCIATION LOCATED IN SERIDÓ/RN ABOUT THE ADVERSE WORKING CONDITIONS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE COLLECTIVE SUBJECT. Revista Eletrônica Em Gestão, Educação e Tecnologia Ambiental, 21(3), 210. https://doi.org/10.5902/2236117028013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free