Adoption of the new antimalarial drug policy in Tanzania - A cross-sectional study in the community

35Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diffusion of the change of first line antimalarial drug from chloroquine (CQ) to sulphadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) at household level in a rural district of Tanzania less than a year after the policy implementation. METHODS: Caretakers in 729 households were interviewed on knowledge of the new policy, home stocking of antimalarials, home-treatment practices of children younger than 5 years with fever, health-seeking behaviour and experience of SP. SP and CQ levels in blood were analysed from 328 children younger than 5 years in the households. Twelve focus group discussions (FGD) were performed with mothers, fathers and health workers. RESULTS: About 51% of the population knew that SP was the first line antimalarial. Only 8% of mothers stocked antimalarials, and only 4% stated self-treatment as the first action. We estimated that 84% of the children who had had fever during the last 4 weeks sought care at public health facilities. SP was detectable in 18% of the total child population and in 32% of those with reported fever, CQ in only 5% and 7%, respectively. The FGDs revealed negative perceptions of SP and fear of severe adverse reactions with mass media reported as key informant. CONCLUSION: The policy had diffused to the communities in the sense that CQ had been changed to SP, which was well known as first line treatment. Moreover, there was a reported dramatic change from self-treatment with CQ to seeking care at public health facilities where SP was given under observation. © 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eriksen, J., Nsimba, S. E. D., Minzi, O. M. S., Sanga, A. J., Petzold, M., Gustafsson, L. L., … Tomson, G. (2005). Adoption of the new antimalarial drug policy in Tanzania - A cross-sectional study in the community. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 10(10), 1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01486.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free