Serum cleaved Tau protein levels and clinical outcome in adult patients with closed head injury

106Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Study objective: Intracranial injuries (ICI) are associated with high mortality and morbidity. Unfortunately, tools for diagnosis and risk stratification of ICIs are limited in the emergency department setting. We determine the relationship between the presence or absence of a detectable cleaved serum Tau protein (τc), ICI, and outcome at hospital discharge in adults with closed head injuries (CHI). Methods: This was a prospective pilot study of adult patients with CHI presenting to the ED of an urban Level t trauma center. Patients presenting within 10 hours of a CHI who underwent a head computed tomographic (CT) scan were eligible. A blood sample was collected at presentation and the τc level wa measured. Initial Glasgow Coma Scale scores and demographic information were recorded. A chart review was performed to determine outcome and final readings on the initial head CT scan. Results: Patients were dichotomized to 1 of 2 groups, those with an ICI (n=17) and those with an isolated skull fracture or no CT abnormality (NICI) (n=11). The 2 groups were similar in regard to demographic composition, mechanism of injury, and coexisting injuries. A τc level of more than 0 was associated with an increased chance of an ICI on the initial head CT scan (odds ratio 11.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17 to 108.4) and a greater chance of poor outcome, defined as death while in hospital or transfer to a nursing home at hospital discharge (odds ratio 8.17; 95% Cl 1.42 to 47). Conclusion: A τc level of more than 0 is associated with a greater chance of intracranial injury and poor outcome in patients with CHI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shaw, G. J., Jauch, E. C., & Zemlan, F. P. (2002). Serum cleaved Tau protein levels and clinical outcome in adult patients with closed head injury. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 39(3), 254–257. https://doi.org/10.1067/mem.2002.121214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free