A modal-epistemic argument for the existence of god

10Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I propose a new argument for the existence of God. God is defined as a conscious being that is the first cause of reality. In its simplified initial form, the argument has two premises: (1) all possible truths are knowable, and (2) it is impossible to know that the proposition that God does not exist is true. From (1) and (2) it follows that the proposition that God exists is necessarily true. After introducing the argument in its crude initial form and laying out the core intuitions behind its premises, I point to two difficulties that this simplified version faces. I then go on to show how the argument can be revised to handle these difficulties. I defend the revised argument from various objections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruten, E. (2014). A modal-epistemic argument for the existence of god. Faith and Philosophy, 31(4), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil201412820

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free