Experimental and numerical investigations of effects of ship superstructures on wind-induced loads for benchmarking

9Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

For a representative large modern containership, the effects of a deck container arrangement on the wind-induced loads were systematically investigated using physical model tests and numerical computations. Numerical simulations based on various turbulence models were performed to validate our predictions against comparative wind tunnel measurements. Not only standard two-equation turbulence models of the unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (URANS) equations solver but also the improved delayed detached eddy simulation (IDDES) and large eddy simulation (LES) turbulence models were used to determine their limits in the prediction of aerodynamic loads. Systematic discretization studies ensured adequate discretization independent predictions. With URANS, numerically predicted wind forces and moments in near-head and near-tail winds were compared favorably with the measured data. However, in oblique winds, URANS predictions deviated from measurements. In oblique winds, flow separations were pronounced; therefore, the flow was strongly transient. Consequently, a two-equation turbulence model was inappropriate. With IDDES, more accurate predictions were achieved, especially in oblique winds. With LES, although the computational effort was high, the agreement of the computed forces and moments with the measured values was superior. Flow details were also presented and discussed. The container arrangement on deck showed major effects on aerodynamic forces and moments. A tarpaulin covering the containers on deck reduced wind resistance by up to 70%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

El Moctar, O., Lantermann, U., Shigunov, V., & Schellin, T. E. (2023). Experimental and numerical investigations of effects of ship superstructures on wind-induced loads for benchmarking. Physics of Fluids, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0146778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free