Does the use of oral nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis reduce the incidence of fungal colonization and/or systemic infection in preterm infants?

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Invasive fungal infection is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Oral nonabsorbable agents are used prophylactically, but the literature regarding their effectiveness has not been systematically reviewed. Objective: To determine if oral nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis reduces the incidence of fungal colonization and/or systemic infection in preterm infants. Methods: The literature was reviewed using the methodology for systematic reviews for the Consensus on Resuscitation Science adapted from the American Heart Association's International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. Results: Five studies were reviewed. Three level of evidence 1 studies and two level of evidence 3/4 studies provided evidence that the prophylactic use of oral nonabsorbable antifungal agents can reduce the incidence of fungal colonization and/or systemic fungal infection in preterm infants. Conclusion: Prophylactic oral nonabsorbable antifungal medications are an acceptable approach to reduce colonization and invasive fungal infection in preterm infants in units with high baseline colonization rates. © 2013 Pulsus Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lam, R. A., & Dow, K. E. (2013). Does the use of oral nonabsorbable antifungal prophylaxis reduce the incidence of fungal colonization and/or systemic infection in preterm infants? Paediatrics and Child Health (Canada). Pulsus Group Inc. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/18.3.134

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free