EXPLORATION OF AN SRSD WRITING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ WRITTEN EXPRESSIONS OF MATH REASONING AND SENSEMAKING

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This exploratory study evaluated the effects of selfregulated strategy development (SRSD) on students’ written expression when asked to solve a word problem and explain reasoning. A secondary question evaluated potential for differential effects based on determination of having mathematics difficulty (MD). We implemented a quasi-experimental design with 163 students with and without MD in grade 4. Results indicated that students in the treatment group (n p 83) significantly outperformed students in the comparison group (n p 80) on measures of mathematical writing involving subtraction and division word problems. For the subtraction problems, students in the treatment group improved their overall written expression of mathematics scores (g p 0.688), yielding a medium effect. The intervention differentially benefited students without MD. Our findings call for greater integration of systematic writing opportunities in mathematics and highlight the importance of explicitly teaching students how to approach the written expression of their mathematical reasoning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hughes, E. M., Riccomini, P. J., Lee, J. Y., Cook, M. J., & Selfridge, K. A. (2024). EXPLORATION OF AN SRSD WRITING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ WRITTEN EXPRESSIONS OF MATH REASONING AND SENSEMAKING. Elementary School Journal, 124(4), 513–541. https://doi.org/10.1086/730114

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free