Comparison of the cognitive effects of premedication with hyoscine and atropine

17Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

An investigation was carried out comparing the nature and duration of the cognitive effects of atropine and hyoscine. Thirty patients undergoing a minor gynaecological operation were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive hyoscine, atropine or placebo as premedication. A battery of psychological tests was administered before premedication, 30 min after premedication, and 1 and 3 h following operation. The tests included orientation questions, simple tasks such as reciting the alphabet, memory tests, a reactiontime test and two tests of visuo-motor co-ordination. The results showed that hyoscine had detrimental effects on memory and on motor tasks compared with placebo, while atropine did not. In addition, the effects on motor performance had not disappeared 3 h after operation. © 1985 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, S., Mcguire, R., & Mckeown, D. (1985). Comparison of the cognitive effects of premedication with hyoscine and atropine. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(2), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/57.2.169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free