Clinical and Economic Assessment of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy With the Hinotori Surgical System: Insights From a Japanese Single-Centre Study

6Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: We investigated the clinical and economic outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the hinotori surgical system (H-RARP). Methods: The analysis was conducted on 76 and 68 patients who underwent RARP using the da Vinci surgical system (D-RARP) and H-RARP, respectively. Safety, oncological, and functional outcomes were compared between H-RARP and D-RARP. Risk factors influencing medical costs in RARP were identified via linear regression analysis. Results: Except for longer operative time in H-RARP, clinical outcomes were comparable. The median medical costs per case were $12,426.8 for D-RARP and $12,548.9 for H-RARP. Operative time (coefficient: 0.0002, p < 0.001), pathological T stage (coefficient: 0.023, p = 0.030), and postoperative hospital stay (coefficient: 0.028, p < 0.001) were significant factors affecting medical costs; in contrast, the type of robot-assisted surgical system was not a significant factor. Conclusions: H-RARP offers clinical outcomes comparable to those of D-RARP while maintaining equivalent medical costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Obayashi, K., Akatsuka, J., Nishino, T., Takadate, M., Hasegawa, H., Mikami, H., … Kondo, Y. (2025). Clinical and Economic Assessment of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy With the Hinotori Surgical System: Insights From a Japanese Single-Centre Study. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.70084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free