A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life

228Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Recently much debate has arisen on the appropriateness of assessing stroke outcomes with stroke impairment scales. Our purpose was to study the relationship between long-term impairments and functional outcomes in terms of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Methods: We studied 87 patients who had a stroke 6 months earlier. Impairments were scored on five stroke scales: The Orgogozo Scale, the National Institutes of Health scale, the Canadian Neurological Scale, the Mathew scale, and the Scandinavian Stroke Scale. Disability was assessed with the Barthel Index, handicap with the Rankin scale, and quality of life with the Sickness Impact Profile. The linear relationship between stroke scales and functional scales was assessed with correlation coefficients. We used regression analyses to explain functional health. Results: The stroke scales were highly related to one another (range, r = –.85 to.92). The correlation between stroke scales and functional scales was

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Haan, R., Horn, J., Limburg, M., Van Der Meulen, J., & Bossuyt, P. (1993). A comparison of five stroke scales with measures of disability, handicap, and quality of life. Stroke, 24(8), 1178–1181. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.24.8.1178

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free