Harpin modulates the accumulation of salicylic acid by Arabidopsis cells via apoplastic alkalization

27Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is reported here that salicylic acid (SA) is rapidly taken up by Arabidopsis cells, and its uptake is accompanied by media alkalization and cytosolic acidification, and it is inhibited by the ionophore nigericin, suggesting that its import is linked with that of H+ and driven by a proton gradient. Such import and accumulation declined sharply within a narrow physiological pH range (pH 5.7-6.1), corresponding to a reduction in the [H +] of the media from 1.99 μmol l-1 to 0.79 μmol l-1. Following the initial uptake, SA was exported back into the media as free SA against a continued [H+]-dependent import. Since the uptake and accumulation of SA declines sharply within a narrow pH range and cell wall alkalization is an early response during incompatible plant/pathogen interactions, the bacterial elicitor harpinPss was used to investigate how SA transport may be modulated during defence responses. Harpin induced a rapid and sustained alkalization of the cell suspension media, reaching the critical pH (pH 5.9-6.1) at which SA import is inhibited at c. 60 min. Such media alkalization corresponded with a reduction in the SA associated with cells co-treated with harpin, and an inhibition of SA uptake in cells pretreated with harpin. Scavengers of ROS, or compounds which generate H 2O2 or NO had little effect on the import or net export of SA, suggesting that media alkalization induced by harpin is sufficient to modulate the kinetics of SA transport. © The Author [2005]. Published by Oxford University Press [on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology]. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, A., Mur, L. A. J., Darby, R. M., & Kenton, P. (2005). Harpin modulates the accumulation of salicylic acid by Arabidopsis cells via apoplastic alkalization. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56(422), 3129–3136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eri310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free