Object-Oriented Baudrillard? Withdrawal and Symbolic Exchange

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

By comparing Object-Oriented Ontology (OOO) and Baudrillard through the lens of a study of the notion of withdrawal in Heidegger's tool analysis and "The Question Concerning Technology", this article explores the extent to which an Object-Oriented Baudrillard is possible, or even necessary. Considering an OOO understanding of Mauss's gift-exchange, a possible critique of duomining in Baudrillard and a revision of Baudrillard's understanding of art, the prospects of a new reading of Baudrillard and interpretation of OOO's genealogy are established. These lines of comparison qualify the role of withdrawal in Baudrillard and symbolic exchange for OOO, and lead towards the conclusion that an Object-Oriented Baudrillard is possible, but may not, conversely, be considered necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

King, M. J. (2019). Object-Oriented Baudrillard? Withdrawal and Symbolic Exchange. Open Philosophy, 2(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free