Evaluation of the Relationship Between Sarcopenia and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: We sought to evaluate the association of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI), which assesses nutritional status, and sarcopenia among older individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods: We enrolled 292 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients aged 60 years and above in this cross-sectional study. This study took place at Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey) between April 2024 and December 2024. European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People-2 (EWGSOP2) criteria were used to define sarcopenia. The relationship between sarcopenia and GNRI was investigated by logistic regression models. Results: The average age was 72 years (range: 60–99). Of the 292 patients, 139 were male and 153 were female. Macrovascular complications and microvascular complications, such as neuropathy and nephropathy, were more common in sarcopenic patients. Low GNRI (< 98) was observed to be more in sarcopenic patients (p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed an association between sarcopenia and neuropathy (p = 0.002) and macrovascular complications (p = 0.038). Conclusions: Sarcopenia was more common in elderly type 2 diabetic patients with low GNRI. Our study emphasizes the high rate of malnutrition among sarcopenic patients, with a need for regular screening programs and the determination of elderly subjects requiring nutritional support. GNRI may serve as a screening indicator for the detection of malnutrition and sarcopenia in older diabetic individuals who are hospitalized.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Calim, A. (2025). Evaluation of the Relationship Between Sarcopenia and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. International Journal of Endocrinology, 2025(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/ije/7492307

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free