The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5

  • Schey S
  • Montero L
  • Stengel-Tosetti C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). Methods: We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5 years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. Results: Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1 months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were 40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of 867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to 3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (813) compared with bortezomib (1173) and thalidomide (1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. Conclusions: Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient's treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. Funding: Celgene Ltd.Copyright © 2016, The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schey, S., Montero, L. F. C., Stengel-Tosetti, C., Gibson, C. J., & Dhanasiri, S. (2017). The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5. Oncology and Therapy, 5(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40487-016-0037-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free