Distinct mechanisms regulate 5-HT2 and thrombin receptor desensitization

61Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have compared the desensitization of two receptors, the thrombin receptor which displays dual coupling to both pertussis toxin-sensitive (G(i)) and -insensitive (G(q)) proteins and the serotonin type 2 (5-HT2) receptor which selectively couples to G(q). In the case of the thrombin receptor, cleavage induces activation and irreversible receptor modification followed by rapid (T( 1/2 ) = 3 min) and extensive desensitization of the receptor's ability to modulate phospholipase C (G(q)). 5-HT-induced desensitization of its receptor is markedly slower (T( 1/2 ) = 10 min) and by 60 min only 50% of the phospholipase C response is lost. This effect occurs with a parallel disappearance of 5-HT receptors from the cell surface. Whole cell phosphorylation studies showed that the thrombin receptor is rapidly phosphorylated upon activation. In contrast, the 5-HT2 receptor displays a low basal level of phosphorylation which is not increased upon agonist treatment. The cytoplasmic tail of the 5-HT2 receptor which contains several protein kinase consensus sequences was found not to be involved in receptor activation or desensitization. However, a chimeric receptor having the core of the 5-HT2 receptor and the cytoplasmic tail of the thrombin receptor was able to undergo 5-HT-induced desensitization and phosphorylation. These results indicate that (i) both 5-HT2 and thrombin receptors have unique shut-off mechanisms, and (ii) that sequences in the carboxyl terminus of the thrombin receptor are sufficient to trigger rapid uncoupling of the receptor from its G protein(s) and downstream effector(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vouret-Craviari, V., Auberger, P., Pouysségur, J., & Van Obberghen-Schilling, E. (1995). Distinct mechanisms regulate 5-HT2 and thrombin receptor desensitization. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 270(9), 4813–4821. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.270.9.4813

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free