Eicosapolyenoic acids

  • Bostock R
  • Savchenko T
  • Lazarus C
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Thirty years ago arachidonic (AA; 20:4 Δ5,8,11,14) and eicosapentaenoic (EPA; 20:5 Δ5,8,11,14,17) acids were identified as elicitors from the late blight pathogen, Phytophthora infestans, capable of triggering the dramatic shifts in isoprenoid metabolism, defense reactions, and cell death associated with the hypersensitive response of potato to incompatible races of the pathogen.1 Among plant pathogens, the capacity for eicosapolyenoic acid synthesis appears to be largely restricted to oomycetes, primitive fungi (e.g., zygomycetes and chytrids), and nematodes. AA and EPA, precursors to eicosanoids that mediate inflammatory responses and serve as critical signals for immune and central nervous system functions in mammals, continue to be compelling molecules for study in plants because of what they may reveal about lipid-based signaling and induced immunity in plant-microbe interactions and possible mechanistic parallels as conserved signaling molecules across eukaryotic kingdoms. In spite of the intriguing...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bostock, R. M., Savchenko, T., Lazarus, C., & Dehesh, K. (2011). Eicosapolyenoic acids. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 6(4), 531–533. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.6.4.14782

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free