Counterpoint: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes

Calvin S. Carter; Sunny C. Huang; Charles C. Searby; Benjamin Cassaidy; Michael J. Miller; Wojciech J. Grzesik; Ted B. Piorczynski; Thomas K. Pak; Susan A. Walsh; Michael Acevedo; Qihong Zhang; Kranti A. Mapuskar; Ginger L. Milne; Antentor O. Hinton; Deng Fu Guo; Robert Weiss; Kyle Bradberry; Eric B. Taylor; Adam J. Rauckhorst; David W. Dick; Vamsidhar Akurathi; Kelly C. Falls-Hubert; Brett A. Wagner; Walter A. Carter; Kai Wang; Andrew W. Norris; Kamal Rahmouni; Garry R. Buettner; Jason M. Hansen; Douglas R. Spitz; E. Dale Abel; Val C. Sheffield

ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Counterpoint: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

DOI: 10.1152/AJPENDO.00110.2021

1Citations

11Readers

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Carter, C. S., Huang, S. C., Searby, C. C., Cassaidy, B., Miller, M. J., Grzesik, W. J., … Sheffield, V. C. (2021, May 1). Counterpoint: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes. American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism. American Physiological Society. https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPENDO.00110.2021

Counterpoint: An alternative hypothesis for why exposure to static magnetic and electric fields treats type 2 diabetes

Cite

Register to see more suggestions