Comparison of environmental and life cycle impact of a switched reluctance motor drive and inverter-fed induction motor drives

8Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper compares the environmental and life cycle impact of one switched reluctance motor (SRM) drive and two inverter-fed induction motor (IM) drives. The study was carried out according to the Directive on the Ecodesign of Energy-Using Products (EuP 2005/32/EC) and following the Methodology for the Ecodesign of Energy-Using Products (MEEUP). The following base-case models were used: an IM (Eff3), an IM (Eff1) and an 8/6 SRM. All of these base-case models are rated at 1.5 kW of output power and are considered to be representative of the low-power range. The analysis shows that SRM drive has a lower environmental impact than the IM drives and offers a high savings potential, comparable to, or even greater than that of the IM (Eff1) in the use phase.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrada, P., Blanqué, B., Martínez, E., Perat, J. I., Sánchez, J. A., & Torrent, M. (2009). Comparison of environmental and life cycle impact of a switched reluctance motor drive and inverter-fed induction motor drives. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 1(7), 260–264. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj07.319

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free