Development and validation of a tool for evaluating YouTube-based medical videos

29Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background/aims: Today, one of the ways to access medical information is the internet. Our objective was to develop a measurement tool to assess the quality of online medical videos. Methods: Online videos covering a variety of subjects (COVID-19, low back pain, weight loss, hypertension, cancer, chest pain, vaccination, asthma, allergy, and cataracts) were evaluated using our Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET) by 25 medical and 25 non-medical professionals. Exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and correlation coefficients were used to assess the validity and reliability of the MQ-VET. Results: The final MQ-VET consisted of 15 items and four sections. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for the full MQ-VET was 0.72, and the internal consistency for all factors was good (between 0.73 and 0.81). The correlation between the DISCERN questionnaire scores and MQ-VET scores was significant. Conclusion: Collectively, our findings indicated that the MQ-VET is a valid and reliable tool that will help to standardize future evaluations of online medical videos.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guler, M. A., & Aydın, E. O. (2022). Development and validation of a tool for evaluating YouTube-based medical videos. Irish Journal of Medical Science, 191(5), 1985–1990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02864-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free