Interspecies scaling of suprachoroidal drug delivery using ocular geometry and drug physicochemical properties

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Excised rabbit, porcine, and bovine eyes were injected in the suprachoroidal space with a cassette of 27 drugs, including 10 beta-blockers, 8 NSAIDs, and 9 corticosteroids, spanning a lipophilicity range (LogD7.4: −4.18 to 4.70). Drug concentrations in retina and vitreous humor were quantified by LC-MS/MS on both injected and non-injected sides. Most drugs were detected in both tissues, with higher concentrations on the injected side (0.04–3.69 fraction dose or FD/g) compared to the non-injected side (0.00–0.74 FD/g), after excluding eight outliers (drug–prodrug pairs and unstable drugs). Total retinal concentrations (0.07–1.88 FD/g) exceeded vitreous concentrations (0.02–0.40 FD/g). Across species, delivery decreased with eye diameter (rabbit > porcine > bovine). For individual species, multiple linear regression explained 70–83% of variance in retinal concentrations and 45–62% in vitreous concentrations using drug physicochemical properties. A unified equation incorporating 1/d² (d is eye diameter in cm), lipophilicity (LogD7.4), molar solubility (LogS), and total polar surface area (TPSA) predicted concentrations in all species for a given tissue, explaining 74% of retinal and 93% of vitreous variance. Retinal delivery scaled for all species: Log FD/g = -1.121 + 0.255*LogD7.4 + 0.106*LogS + 0.004*TPSA + 0.395*1/d2. Vitreous humor delivery scaled for all species: Log FD/g = -1.898–0.047*LogD7.4 − 0.051*LogS + 0.001*TPSA + 0.833*1/d2. While this study evaluated static barriers, in vivo delivery is expected to be lower due to dynamic clearance mechanisms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patil, M. A., Matter, B. A., Santana, C., & Kompella, U. B. (2026). Interspecies scaling of suprachoroidal drug delivery using ocular geometry and drug physicochemical properties. Scientific Reports, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-34631-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free