Care needs of children with disabilities – Use of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory

  • Teles F
  • Resegue R
  • Puccini R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To describe the care needs reported by caregivers of children with disabilities going through the school inclusion process using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Methods: Cross-sectional study with 181 children aged 7-10 years with physical or mental disabilities , undergoing the inclusion process in elementary school in 2007. Location: 31 schools of the Regional Education Board-District of Penha, East Side the city of São Paulo. The children's care needs according to the caregivers were assessed in three areas-self-care, mobility and social function, using the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, according to the following score: 5, Independent; 4, Supervision; 3, Minimum Assistance; 2, Moderate Assistance; 1, Maximum Assistance and 0, Total Assistance. For statistical analysis, we used Student's t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA), with p<0.05 being statistically significant. Results: The lower means, with statistically significant differences, were observed for the items related to social function (55.8-72.0), followed by self-care functions (56.0-96.5); for all types of disabilities, except for children with physical disabilities, who had lower means for self-care (56.0) and mobility (63.8). Conclusions: Social function was the area referred to as the one that needed a higher degree of assistance from the caregiver and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory is a tool that can help identify these needs and develop a more targeted intervention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teles, F. M., Resegue, R., & Puccini, R. F. (2016). Care needs of children with disabilities – Use of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Revista Paulista de Pediatria (English Edition), 34(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.02.015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free