Abstract
Objective: To compare dental arch relationship, craniofacial form, and nasolabial aesthetic outcomes among cleft centers using distinct methods of presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four cleft centers in North America. Patients: One hundred ninety-one children with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). Main Outcome Measures: Dental arch relationship was assessed using the GOSLON Yardstick. Craniofacial form was assessed by 12 cephalometric measurements. Nasolabial aesthetics were assessed using the Asher-McDade system. Assessments were performed between 6 and 12 years of age. Results: The center that used no PSIO achieved the most favorable dental arch relationship and maxillomandibular relationship, with a median GOSLON score of 2.3 (P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kornbluth, M., Campbell, R. E., Daskalogiannakis, J., Ross, E. J., Glick, P. H., Russell, K. A., … Sitzman, T. J. (2018). Active presurgical infant orthopedics for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Intercenter outcome comparison of Latham, modified McNeil, and nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 55(5), 648–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618757367
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.