Active presurgical infant orthopedics for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Intercenter outcome comparison of Latham, modified McNeil, and nasoalveolar molding

59Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare dental arch relationship, craniofacial form, and nasolabial aesthetic outcomes among cleft centers using distinct methods of presurgical infant orthopedics (PSIO). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Four cleft centers in North America. Patients: One hundred ninety-one children with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP). Main Outcome Measures: Dental arch relationship was assessed using the GOSLON Yardstick. Craniofacial form was assessed by 12 cephalometric measurements. Nasolabial aesthetics were assessed using the Asher-McDade system. Assessments were performed between 6 and 12 years of age. Results: The center that used no PSIO achieved the most favorable dental arch relationship and maxillomandibular relationship, with a median GOSLON score of 2.3 (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kornbluth, M., Campbell, R. E., Daskalogiannakis, J., Ross, E. J., Glick, P. H., Russell, K. A., … Sitzman, T. J. (2018). Active presurgical infant orthopedics for unilateral cleft lip and palate: Intercenter outcome comparison of Latham, modified McNeil, and nasoalveolar molding. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal, 55(5), 648–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618757367

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free