Post-challenge blood glucose concentration and stroke mortality rates in non-diabetic men in London: 38-Year follow-up of the original Whitehall prospective cohort study

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: While individuals with diabetes have a raised risk of stroke, it is unclear whether hyperglycaemia in non-diabetic populations is related to the development of this disease. Methods: In this prospective cohort study of 19,019 men, capillary blood was drawn 2 h after consumption of a glucose preparation equivalent to 50 g of anhydrous dextrose. Study participants were then followed for mortality for a maximum of 38 years. Results: During follow-up of 18,406 non-diabetic men, 13,116 deaths occurred (1,189 by stroke). Plots of stroke mortality rates versus blood glucose identified an upward inflection in risk of death from stroke at about 4.6 mmol/l. This upward inflection in risk could be adequately described using a single linear term above this threshold. A 1 mmol/l increase in blood glucose after this point was associated with a 27% increase in risk of death from stroke (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% CI 1.14-1.42). This increase in risk was partially attenuated by adjustment for covariates (1.17, 1.04-1.31) but remained statistically significant at conventional levels. Similar observations were made when all-cause mortality was the outcome of interest, although the magnitude of the association with blood glucose was somewhat lower. Conclusions/interpretation: An incremental elevation in stroke mortality rates occurs with increasing post-challenge blood glucose. © 2008 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Batty, G. D., Kivimäki, M., Davey Smith, G., Marmot, M. G., & Shipley, M. J. (2008). Post-challenge blood glucose concentration and stroke mortality rates in non-diabetic men in London: 38-Year follow-up of the original Whitehall prospective cohort study. Diabetologia, 51(7), 1123–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-008-1005-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free