The two Kronik Tionghua of Semarang and Cirebon: A note on provenance and reliability

8Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article is the first comprehensive evaluation of the provenance and reliability of the two enigmatic Kronik Tionghua texts of Semarang and Cirebon (the 'Malay Annals of Semarang and Cerbon'). Initially published by M.O. Parlindungan in 1964, historians have increasingly begun to use these documents when reconstructing Java's early Islamic history. This article is a long overdue attempt to positively identify the Dutch colonial official (Cornelis Poortman) whom Parlindungan claims to have received the texts from. Although the article establishes that Parlindungan almost certainly knew this individual, discrepancies between his version of Poortman's career and official Dutch records raise questions about whether Poortman could have found the two Kronik Tionghua, at least in the manner described. The article then ends with a close textual analysis of both Kronik Tionghua which demonstrates the possibility that both texts were written by a modern, Dutch-educated author. The article therefore concludes that both texts are probable fabrications, albeit ones based on authentic texts.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wain, A. (2017). The two Kronik Tionghua of Semarang and Cirebon: A note on provenance and reliability. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(2), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463417000030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free