Effects of Social Comparison Direction, Comparison Distance, and Message Framing on Health Behavioral Intention in Online Support Groups

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study advances prior research on social comparison by testing the effects of social comparison direction, comparison distance, as well as message framing on perceived similarity, self-esteem, and health behavioral intention in the context of an online support group (OSG) for diet and weight loss. A 2 (comparison direction: up vs. down) by 2 (comparison distance: high vs. low) by 2 (framing: gain vs. loss) factorial experiment involving 275 adult participants was conducted online in the United States. Findings showed that participants perceived themselves to be more similar to the comparison target who was doing better than themselves than the target who was doing worse. The difference of perceived similarity between comparison directions was greater when comparison distance was low than high. However, upward comparison decreased self-esteem whereas downward comparison enhanced self-esteem. Perceived similarity and self-esteem both contributed to health efficacy, which led to health behavioral intention. Message framing did not show a significant impact on perceived similarity or self-esteem. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malloch, Y. Z., Zhang, J., & Qian, S. (2023). Effects of Social Comparison Direction, Comparison Distance, and Message Framing on Health Behavioral Intention in Online Support Groups. Cyberpsychology, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2023-3-10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free