A tale of two fields: Management legacy, soil health, and productivity

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Adjacent fields with contrasting histories present an opportunity to evaluate the legacy of management on soil health (SH) and grain productivity. In 2011, two fields transitioned to no-till grain production. During the previous 25 yr, one was pasture (pasture-to-grain; PTG), whereas the other was annually tilled for grain cropping (long-term grain; LTG). The study objectives were to contrast these two fields relative to SH and productivity. Yield data was collected from 2011 to 2021 and SH sampled in 2021. The PTG out-yielded LTG each year, with an average 46% yield increase. 2021 SH metrics demonstrated similar trends, with PTG 62% higher than LTG. Contrasting across fields (2020–2021), SH metrics were related to yield (r2 =.46–.78), but these relationships weakened when assessed within each field. These findings affirm SH indicators are sensitive to the legacy of management and are meaningful indicators of productivity across sites but less informative for within-field variability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Svedin, J., Kitchen, N. R., Ransom, C. J., Veum, K. S., & Myers, R. L. (2022). A tale of two fields: Management legacy, soil health, and productivity. Agricultural and Environmental Letters, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ael2.20090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free