Effect of a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar compared with trastuzumab on overall response rate in patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial

136Citations
Citations of this article
201Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Treatment with the anti-ERBB2 humanized monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and chemotherapy significantly improves outcome in patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer; a clinically effective biosimilar may help increase access to this therapy. OBJECTIVE To compare the overall response rate and assess the safety of a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar plus a taxane or trastuzumab plus a taxane in patients without prior treatment for ERBB2-positivemetastatic breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, phase 3 equivalence study in patients with metastatic breast cancer. From December 2012 to August 2015, 500 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive a proposed biosimilar or trastuzumab plus a taxane. Chemotherapy was administered for at least 24 weeks followed by antibody alone until unacceptable toxic effects or disease progression occurred. INTERVENTIONS Proposed biosimilar (n = 230) or trastuzumab (n = 228) with a taxane. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcomewasweek 24 overall response rate (ORR) defined as complete or partial response. Equivalence boundaries were 0.81 to 1.24 with a 90% CI for ORR ratio (proposed biosimilar/trastuzumab) and -15%to 15%with a 95% CI for ORR difference. Secondary outcome measures included time to tumor progression, progression-free and overall survival at week 48, and adverse events. RESULTS Among500women randomized, the intention-to-treat population included 458 women (mean [SD] age, 53.6 [11.11] years) and the safety population included 493women. TheORRwas 69.6%(95%CI, 63.62%-75.51%) for the proposed biosimilar vs 64.0%(95%CI, 57.81%-70.26%) for trastuzumab. TheORRratio (1.09;90%CI,0.974-1.211) andORRdifference (5.53; 95%CI, -3.08 to 14.04)were within the equivalence boundaries.Atweek 48, therewas no statistically significant difference with the proposed biosimilar vs trastuzumab for time to tumor progression (41.3%vs 43.0%; -1.7%; 95%CI, -11.1%to 6.9%), progression-free survival (44.3% vs 44.7%; -0.4%; 95%CI, -9.4%to 8.7%), or overall survival (89.1%vs 85.1%; 4.0%; 95%CI, -2.1%to 10.3%). In the proposed biosimilar and trastuzumab groups, 239 (98.6%) and 233 (94.7%) had at least 1 adverse event, the mostcommonincluding neutropenia (57.5%vs 53.3%), peripheral neuropathy (23.1%vs 24.8%), and diarrhea (20.6%vs 20.7%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Amongwomen with ERBB2-positivemetastatic breast cancer receiving taxanes, the use of a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar compared with trastuzumab resulted in an equivalent overall response rate at 24 weeks. Further study is needed to assess safety and long-term clinical outcome.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rugo, H. S., Barve, A., Waller, C. F., Hernandez-Bronchud, M., Herson, J., Yuan, J., … Pennella, E. (2017). Effect of a proposed trastuzumab biosimilar compared with trastuzumab on overall response rate in patients with ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 317(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.18305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free