Therapy for sleep apnea syndrome: Comparison between nCPAP and MAS

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Improvements in subjective symptoms, changes in the apnea index (AI), and complications were studied in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) who were treated with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or a mandibular advancement splint (MAS). Subjects: The subjects consisted of 32 patients (30 males and 2 females) with habitual snoring and sleep apnea. Methods: AI was measured using an apnea monitor (APNOMONITOR II®, Chest Co.). Sleep apnea was defined as the cessation of respiration for 10 seconds or longer during sleep. Complications, improvements in subjective symptoms and changes in AI were investigated during and after each treatment. Results: Subjective symptoms improved in 24 of 25 patients undergoing nCPAP treatment. Meanwhile, subjective symptoms disappeared or improved in all patients receiving MAS. AI improved in 21 of 25 patients with nCPAP and in all patients with MAS. As complications of nCPAP, xerostomia was noted in 4 patients, breathing difficulty in 4 and recurrent arousal in 3. In contrast, temporomandibular arthralgia was noted in only 3 patients with MAS. Conclusion: The continuity rate of MAS was high and its efficacy was comparable to that of nCPAP in patients with OSAS.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsubaki, K., Ishii, K., Abe, K., Yamamoto, M., Haga, M., & Noguchi, T. (2002). Therapy for sleep apnea syndrome: Comparison between nCPAP and MAS. Practica Oto-Rhino-Laryngologica, 95(10), 1059–1063. https://doi.org/10.5631/jibirin.95.1059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free