Esfínter artificial para la reconstrucción anorrectal total. Reporte preliminar y revisión de técnica quirúrgica

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The artificial sphincter (ABS) has been proposed as an option for the treatment for severe refractory fecal incontinence. We have witnessed a great discussion on systematic reviews regarding the short-and long-term results of ABS, assessing its real benefit. Objective: To analyze the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing artificial sphincter implantation and review of surgical technique. Material and Methods: Between 2003 and 2007, the ABS system was introduced in four patients. The mean age was 34 years (13 to 54 years). Two patients were admitted for rectal agenesis, a severe anorectal trauma and abdominoperineal resection for a low rectal cancer. Results: Follow-up time was 12 to 60 months. We performed the explantation of the device for perineal wound infection in one case. All patients had mild incontinence ABS showed a decrease an average of 3.5 points to 12 months of follow-up on the Wexner Scale. Conclusions: The installation of the artificial sphincter is a feasible and safe alternative for anorectal reconstruction in selected patients. The morbidity and explantation of the series is similar to other international reports.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ocares U., M., Caselli M., G., Caselli M., B., Benavides Y., C., & Flores O., L. (2009). Esfínter artificial para la reconstrucción anorrectal total. Reporte preliminar y revisión de técnica quirúrgica. Revista Chilena de Cirugia, 61(4), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-40262009000400008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free