Diagnosis of foreign body aspiration with ultralow-dose CT using a tin filter: a comparison study

29Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Suspected airway foreign body aspiration (FBA) is a common event in paediatric emergency units, especially in children under 3 years of age. It can be a life-threatening event if not diagnosed promptly and accurately. The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic performance of an ultralow-dose CT (DLP of around 1 mGycm) with that of conventional radiographic methods (fluoroscopy and chest radiography of the airways) in the diagnosis of FBA children’s airways. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Data from 136 children were collected: 75 were examined with conventional radiographic methods and 61 with ultralow-dose CT. Effective doses were compared using independent t tests. The results of bronchoscopy, if performed, were used in creating contingency 2 × 2 tables to assess the diagnostic performance between modalities. An extra triple reading of all images was applied for this purpose. Results: The effective doses used in the ultralow-dose CT examinations were lower compared with those in conventional methods (p < 0.001). The median dose for CT was 0.04 mSv compared with 0.1 mSv for conventional methods. Sensitivity and specificity were higher for ultralow-dose CT than those for conventional methods (100% and 98% versus 33% and 96%) as were the positive and negative predicted values (90% and 100% versus 60% and 91%). Conclusion: Ultralow-dose CT can be used as the imaging of choice in the diagnosis of airway FBA in emergency settings, thereby avoiding concerns about radiation doses and negative bronchoscopy outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gordon, L., Nowik, P., Mobini Kesheh, S., Lidegran, M., & Diaz, S. (2020). Diagnosis of foreign body aspiration with ultralow-dose CT using a tin filter: a comparison study. Emergency Radiology, 27(4), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-020-01764-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free