Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as health-related quality of life, mental disorder and psychological distress among users of time-release (TR) versus immediate-release formulations of three commonly prescribed antidepressants in a sample of the US working population. Methods: Adjusted multiple linear and logistic regression analyses using data from 2004 to 2010 Medical Expenditures Panel Surveys were conducted. The health-related quality of life was measured based on the Physical Component Summary (PCS-12) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS-12) of the SF-12v2. The mental disorder and the psychological distress were measured by the Patient Health Questionniare-2 and the Kessler 6 respectively. Key findings: The utilization of TR formulations was not associated with higher scores in the SF12-v2, (β=-0.546, P=0.442) and (β=-0.806, P=0.346) for both PCS-12 and MCS-12 respectively. The users of TR formulations did not significantly differ in their likelihood of having a score of ≥3 in the Patient Health Questionniare-2 (OR=1.048, P=0.677). Furthermore, the utilization of TR formulations was not associated with lower scores in the Kessler 6 Scale (β=0.073, P=0.846). Conclusions: Although controlled clinical trials report favourable tolerability profiles for TR formulations, it still remains unclear whether these formulations lead to better PROs in real-world patient-care settings. JPHSR © 2014 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Al-Ruthia, Y., & Hong, S. H. (2014). Time-release versus immediate-release formulations of venlafaxine, paroxetine and bupropion: A comparative study of a nationally representative sample of the US working population. Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, 5(2), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/jphs.12049
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.