Laparascopic colon resection for cancer: evidence based results.

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

About 90-92% of patients with carcinoma of the colon are treated surgically. For other surgeons, laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of malignancies remains controversial because of concerns about the adequacy of lymphadenectomy, the extent of resection, early findings of port-site metastasis and the lack of data on long-term results. In our experience, there are no differences between the laparoscopic and laparotomic techniques, and only advantages if the laparoscopic technique is use correctly. We essentially agree with the good results of many studies published in the last ten years, but we are extremely confident that it is necessary to have a good learning curve and a high-volume cases hospital to obtain good results through a laparoscopic approach. So laparoscopic colorectal surgery should be performed only by surgeons who have completed training in this approach and who perform the procedure often enough to maintain a good level of competence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bracale, U., Barone, M., Pema, F., Nastro, P., & Pignata, G. (2010). Laparascopic colon resection for cancer: evidence based results. Acta Chirurgica Iugoslavica. https://doi.org/10.2298/ACI1003037B

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free