Abstract
There is growing evidence that judges and magistrates experience both high stress and high satisfaction in their work; however, the subjective experience of judicial stress and the cultural and professional factors shaping that experience remain largely unexamined. This qualitative study builds upon earlier quantitative research with the Australian judiciary, by exploring judges’ and magistrates’ perceptions of the sources and impacts of judicial stress and their ideas for court responses. Thematic analysis of 59 in-depth interviews with judicial officers from five Australian courts revealed eight themes pertaining to the better understanding and management of occupational stress within the judiciary. Implications for courts and individual judicial officers are discussed.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Schrever, C., Hulbert, C., & Sourdin, T. (2024). The privilege and the pressure: judges’ and magistrates’ reflections on the sources and impacts of stress in judicial work. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 31(3), 327–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2024.2335913
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.