Assessing the Nature of Science Views of Singaporean Pre-Service Teachers

  • Thye T
  • Kwen B
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite the many developments in the teaching of science, an aspect that continues to be neglected appears to be the character and nature of science (NOS). This is becoming especially important in the light of recent developments in pedagogy, as, for example, more teachers adopt constructivist methodologies and computing technology enables simulations that may blur the lines between models and reality. From the literature, it is known that teachers’ modern NOS conceptions, though not a sufficient condition for transmission of modern NOS views, is necessary. In this study, pre-service teachers’ NOS conceptions are assessed with an adapted Views of the Nature of Science (VNOS) instrument, originally designed by Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, and Schwartz (2002). The modified instrument is an eight-item, open ended questionnaire designed to elicit descriptive responses to common NOS misconceptions. Responses were analysed into coded categories of informed, ill-informed, and ambiguous. It was found that a significant proportion of teachers possessed ill-informed views. Some implications for teaching and teacher education are presented in this paper for discussion.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thye, T. L., & Kwen, B. (2004). Assessing the Nature of Science Views of Singaporean Pre-Service Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2004v29n2.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free