The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge?

27Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study asks the question on which national 'shoulders' the world's top-level research stands. Traditionally, the number of citations to national papers has been the evaluative measures of national scientific standings. We raise a different question: instead of analyzing the citations to a countries' articles (the forward view), we examine references to prior publications from specific countries cited in the most elite publications (the backward Dcitingd view). "Elite publications" are operationalized as the top-1% most-highly cited articles. Using the articles published from 2004 to 2013, we examine the research referenced in these works. Our results confirm the well-known fact that China has emerged to become a major player in science. However, China still belongs to the low contributors when countries are ranked as contributors to the cited references in top-1% articles. Using this perspective, the results do not support a decreasing trend for the USA; in fact, the USA exceeds expectations (compared to its publication share) in terms of references in the top-1% articles. Switzerland, Sweden, and the Netherlands also appear at the top of the list. However, the results for Germany are lower than statistically expected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018). The geography of references in elite articles: Which countries contribute to the archives of knowledge? PLoS ONE, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194805

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free