Clearing the haze: What do we still need to learn about electronic nicotine delivery systems?

0Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS; i.e., electronic cigarettes, e-cigarettes, vaping devices, vape pens) were introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 as a potential harm reduction alternative for people who smoked combustible cigarettes. Since that time, ENDS popularity grew very quickly, particularly among individuals who smoke cigarettes. However, young people and never smokers also started using ENDS, cohorts for whom these products were not intended. There are now a broad range of devices and eliquid constituents. ENDS devices vary considerably in their design and generation of potentially toxic chemicals, with higher power devices likely much more hazardous than lower power devices. This landscape may further change after September 9, 2020, when all ENDS manufacturers are required to submit a premarket tobacco product application to the FDA to obtain authorization for marketing. Research has not kept pace with this rapidly changing technology and important questions remain regarding the relative benefits versus risks of ENDS. In light of these challenges, we propose key ENDS research priorities to address these gaps.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fucito, L. M., Malinosky, H., Baldassarri, S. R., & Herbst, R. S. (2021, January 1). Clearing the haze: What do we still need to learn about electronic nicotine delivery systems? Cancer Prevention Research. American Association for Cancer Research Inc. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-0394

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free