The lawyer in the Dutch interrogation room: Influence on police and suspect

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

In many European countries, providing a suspect in custody with legal aid before the first police interrogation is a heavily debated issue. In this paper, we report on an exploratory study on the use of coercion by the police and the use of the right to silence by suspects in 70 Dutch homicide cases and their relation to prior consultation and presence of a lawyer. Analysis of the data indicates that there is a relation between the presence of a lawyer in the interrogation room and the way in which police interrogators use coercion. To gain insight into whether the police use coercion and how this is achieved, we looked at the extent to which the interrogators make use of certain interrogation techniques and how the interrogation techniques are used to exert coercion. We found that legal advice from a lawyer before and during the interrogation corresponds with suspects more often using their right to silence. It also appears that the police are inclined to use 'hard coercion' when confronted with a silent suspect. The research thus raises the question as to whether the presence of a lawyer is an adequate way to prevent false confessions. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Verhoeven, W. J., & Stevens, L. (2012). The lawyer in the Dutch interrogation room: Influence on police and suspect. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 9(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1354

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free