All triptans are not the same

9Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The current review provides a brief summary of the key pre-clinical and clinical characteristics of the triptans that might influence the choice of drug. Data from extensive clinical trials tentatively suggest that eletriptan and rizatriptan may offer an advantage over other triptans on the basis of two clinically important efficacy parameters: eletriptan has the highest likelihood of sustained headache response, while rizatriptan has the highest likelihood of achieving and sustaining a pain-free response. In terms of tolerability, best-in-class goes to naratriptan, almotriptan, and frovatriptan, though the tolerability profile of triptans is very good overall, and patient preference appears to be more closely correlated with efficacy than tolerability. A need is noted for more double-blind studies that directly compare triptans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rapoport, A. M., & Tepper, S. J. (2001). All triptans are not the same. Journal of Headache and Pain, 2(SUPPL. 1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s101940170017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free