Effect of NO3- transport and reduction on intracellular pH: An in vivo NMR study in maize roots

33Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effect of NO3- uptake on cellular pH was studied in maize roots by an in vivo 31P-NMR technique. In order to separate the effects on cytoplasmic pH due to NO3- uptake from those due to NO3- reduction, tungstate was used to inhibit nitrate reductase (NR). The results confirm that in maize roots tungstate inhibited NR activity. 15N-NMR in vivo experiments demonstrated the cessation of nitrogen flux from nitrate to organic compounds. Tungstate affected neither NO3- uptake nor the levels of the main phosphorylated compounds. Slight changes in cytoplasmic pH were observed during NO3- uptake and reduction (i.e. control). By contrast, in the presence of tungstate, a consistent decrease in cytoplasmic pH occurred. The vacuolar pH did not change in any of the conditions tested. These data show that NO3- uptake is an acidifying process and suggest a possible involvement of NO3- reduction in pH homeostasis. In the presence of NO3-, a transient depolarization of transmembrane electric potential difference (Em) was observed in all the conditions analysed. However, in tungstate-treated roots, a lesser depolarization accompanied by a greater ability to recover Em, was found. This was related to a higher activity of the plasma membrane (PM) H +-ATPase. When NO3- was administered as potassium salt, its uptake increased and a greater depolarization of E m took place, whilst the changes in cytoplasmic pH were remarkably reduced, according to the central role played by K+ in the control of plasma membrane activities and cell pH homeostasis. A possible involvement of cytoplasmic pH in the control of PM H+-ATPase expression during nitrate exposure is suggested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Espen, L., Nocito, F. F., & Cocucci, M. (2004). Effect of NO3- transport and reduction on intracellular pH: An in vivo NMR study in maize roots. Journal of Experimental Botany, 55(405), 2053–2061. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh231

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free